Props have all been balanced. Still shakesLOL. Maybe you try it with prop balancing.![]()
Props have all been balanced. Still shakesLOL. Maybe you try it with prop balancing.![]()
This is simply not true. I have worked on probably over 100 commercial and professional shoots that have utilized drones. Except for the big budget projects which use heavy lifters for a Red or Alexa the drone is ALWAYS a DJI. This has been the case since the original Phantom and through the P2 P3 Inspire and now the P4. The Inspire X5R is what most DPs are excited about now. It will seriously cut into the business of large octos flying Reds. DJI is the industry standard for small drones. I have to date not seen a single Solo on a film set.Who says they're "losing the drone competition?"
They perhaps don't sell as many recreational drones, but for professional use (from Canada to LA, Las Vegas to Seattle) I've seen more Solo on mid-size shoots than Phantoms, and moreover, Solo dominates the sub 5000.00 category for commercial/enterprise use due to the number of FLIR cameras, live feed straight out of the box with no mod. 3DR are very appealing to the commercial market due to open source, field replaceable, and easily programmed for repeatable flight.
The best upgrade that 3DR could offer me right now is a set of 4 new improved reliable motors that don't introduce shake and vibration into the bird. You can't fix that with a firmware update.This was one of the marketing promises that hooked me at the product launch, but it is becoming irrelevant. I saw it as a way to keep Solo up to date for maybe 2-3 years. The concept of "future proof" high tech devices is really an oxymoron, especially in a field where more competitors are popping up and making leaps and bounds forward in hardware and software based features and improvements. It's like with smart phones. They give you occasional improvements and new features from time to time with system updates. But eventually you need the latest new phone if you want the most up to date performance. It's the same with drones. Sure, it's nice to get some new features like MPCC now and then through firmware updates, but that can only carry you so far into the future before a major hardware upgrade is necessary to remain up to date with the competition. And on top of it all, 3DR really kind of squandered almost a whole year of "future proof" just trying to make the Solo do what they promised at NAB. It was more like "past proofing." The best upgrade that 3DR could offer me right now is a set of 4 new improved reliable motors that don't introduce shake and vibration into the bird. You can't fix that with a firmware update.
Did they ever fix their "flyaway" problem? Seems kinda scary..This is simply not true. I have worked on probably over 100 commercial and professional shoots that have utilized drones. Except for the big budget projects which use heavy lifters for a Red or Alexa the drone is ALWAYS a DJI. This has been the case since the original Phantom and through the P2 P3 Inspire and now the P4. The Inspire X5R is what most DPs are excited about now. It will seriously cut into the business of large octos flying Reds. DJI is the industry standard for small drones. I have to date not seen a single Solo on a film set.
It may be true that all motors introduce vibration. But if so then the DJI gimbals are taking it out. I have never needed to post stabilize footage from my Phantoms. I have also never had a DJI motor fail.The best upgrade that 3DR could offer me right now is a set of 4 new improved reliable motors that don't introduce shake and vibration into the bird. You can't fix that with a firmware update.
I'm not aware of any motors that don't introduce shake and vibration- virtually all need some amount of balancing. Can you tell us which motors you are referring to?
I have never experienced a Phantom fly away. Again, that is with first hand experience on over 100 professional productions. I have seen a few crashed, all due to pilot error.Did they ever fix their "flyaway" problem? Seems kinda scary..
I think NAB 2016 will be very telling. We will see if 3DR makes any big announcements about the future of Solo. If not, then we know it's the end of the line for Solo. I just listened to the latest Drone U podcast and they said they have written the Solo off as a "flop." They think that based on 3DR closing offices and laying off staff that Solo is finished. We should know in a few weeks. If there is a future for Solo then there should be big announcements on the NAB floor. If not then we all own an obsolete piece of drone history that we can display on a shelf.Guys, The fanboy response does not help the discussion. I think the things we should be talking about is where are these promise upgrades? and if upgrades are on the agenda, which ones would be most desirable, and if 3DR doesn't want to do the upgrades, do we want to spend the time and treasure to do it ourselves? Or is the latest DJI or some other bird better, and should we just put our solos on the shelf for better bird?
Who says they're "losing the drone competition?"
They perhaps don't sell as many recreational drones, but for professional use (from Canada to LA, Las Vegas to Seattle) I've seen more Solo on mid-size shoots than Phantoms, and moreover, Solo dominates the sub 5000.00 category for commercial/enterprise use due to the number of FLIR cameras, live feed straight out of the box with no mod. 3DR are very appealing to the commercial market due to open source, field replaceable, and easily programmed for repeatable flight.
Dude, as a guy who's flown every iteration of the Phantom including the latest - and who currently owns two versions - I can assure you... well...You haven't flown a Phantom lately or ever.
Every product has it's issues and I am glad you are thrilled with the P4, and not part of the growing users in the 'returning the P4' boards. AG suits, false advertising, etc. I think the P4 is a great advancement and certainly has it's place in the market. But there are certainly more complaints about DJI service (or lack there of) and why many came to the Solo. And if you have a Solo, you know it can do the 'follow my finger' trick you mentioned. Ever try Tower?You haven't flown a Phantom lately or ever.
If you are any kind of experienced dronie then you would know this.
When you own both at the same time you too will be disappointed but enlightened.
own a 25 yr old residential commercial comminations tech company
Funny.I have always been skeptical of a product who has such a warranty as to cover a possible fly away.
But the real answer is Nothing! There has been (0) Zero. Nothing. No advancements from the Original Solo from a year ago. Unless you call ending customer phone support as something new and impressive.
It's hard for me to take a Date out for the evening and spend a thousand dollars and now our relationship is my text and email. Great! And that is the service 3D Robotics is now offering.
The 2016 P4 and 2015 Solo1 are completely different vehicles in so may ways. The P4s follow me does require the controller or any transmitter to be onboer the subject being racked. The P4 follows the objects image. The Solo
Follow me is similar to the image track. Also a P4 feature is you can point on the map and the P4 will fly there.
I have had 4 Iris+ and 4 Solo. So, I not only know 3DR, the vehicles, and it's integral components they each offer but the horribly disappointment it was when I tried to get service on my latest Solo only to find out their phone service has ended.
My advice, purchase from Best Buy or Frye's Electronics so you can be assured a channel for a return.
I have always supported 3DR and their products. They were heading the right direction. But since they've decided they had too or could not afford to continue customer support it is made many people wonder, including myself, the condition of the company. All I can say is if you haven't tried the Phantom 4 it is truly an impressive aerial photo platform. Take it from someone who has owns Both!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.