- Joined
- May 8, 2015
- Messages
- 546
- Reaction score
- 104
- Age
- 59
- Location
- Fort Collins, Colorado
- Website
- dattagroover.com
Yeah, but not in a good way. As stated above, if you have to resort to deceptive advertising, that's not great news for the product, and definitely not good in terms of trusting the company.I think what they're thinking it makes people keep talking about it. And apparently they're right![]()
Yep. Either way, they sure got a lot of attention.If that library video wasn't shot with some revolutionary tiny drone running a micro gimbal then this drone is going to suck. I mean are they nuts releasing a video like that as it implies that the whole thing was shot on their new drone. Let's see what this thing turns out be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, that's interesting. It's big to travel with, though, so probably wouldn't work for me. I need something I can put in my checked luggage and still have room for my underwear. The Solo is the perfect size for that. Depending on that MFT camera though, it might be capable of some awesome footage. THing is, If I was going to go that big, I'd probably go with an Octo or at least Hexacopter.well with 3Dr turning their back on consumers, DJI is still well DJI
Yuneec has great products but the cameras a mediocre (from what I have seen)
It is time to build, and keep an eye on the next platform. Going to watch that powereye
Looking at the company specs, it folds up pretty small - in the same ballpark as the Solo. I'll be keeping my eye on that, too.Yeah, that's interesting. It's big to travel with, though, so probably wouldn't work for me. I need something I can put in my checked luggage and still have room for my underwear. The Solo is the perfect size for that. Depending on that MFT camera though, it might be capable of some awesome footage. THing is, If I was going to go that big, I'd probably go with an Octo or at least Hexacopter.
99% of gopros marketshare probably bought it hook, line and sinker. The hikers, the skiers, etc. What do they know? I'm certain most don't have a uav to know the difference. Yes, we will all be very critical because we know what to look for, but I think the rank-and-file gopro consumer will think it's the bees knees. Even based on footage like this lol.If that library video wasn't shot with some revolutionary tiny drone running a micro gimbal then this drone is going to suck. I mean are they nuts releasing a video like that as it implies that the whole thing was shot on their new drone. Let's see what this thing turns out be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of course when word gets out that it was a fraud, you would think there would be some serious repercussions.99% of gopros marketshare probably bought it hook, line and sinker. The hikers, the skiers, etc. What do they know? I'm certain most don't have a uav to know the difference. Yes, we will all be very critical because we know what to look for, but I think the rank-and-file gopro consumer will think it's the bees knees. Even based on footage like this lol.
If the Hero5 is on a jib then how is it going through the bookcase and light. If it is a drone it is a very small drone. Also, it looks like the space on the bookcase and light is about the same width and maybe height. Also, I think the video was sped up because a drone was flown very slow. Speeding up the video may give the appearance of walking because a drone is trying to maintain altitude. What do you think about my observations. Am I dreaming of unicorns or do you think the bookcase and light pass through are digital.I think it was a handheld gimbal. You can see it moving up and down slightly with footsteps.
If the Hero5 is on a jib then how is it going through the bookcase and light. If it is a drone it is a very small drone. Also, it looks like the space on the bookcase and light is about the same width and maybe height. Also, I think the video was sped up because a drone was flown very slow. Speeding up the video may give the appearance of walking because a drone is trying to maintain altitude. What do you think about my observations. Am I dreaming of unicorns or do you think the bookcase and light pass through are digital.
I have a high degree of confidence that the library scene is a pure flying shot.
There is no way that's a flying shot. Not a chance.
Going through the book shelf - the ground effect and turbulence from flying through such a tight enclosed space would have made it impossible to be that smooth.
Flying over the table, there are papers and pens that would have been blown right off the desk. Have you ever stood under the Solo, or even a typical 250 class quad while it's hovering even 4 to 5 feet above you? The camera was inches above the desk in that shot, as evidenced by it scooting through the desk lamp.
I highly doubt they would have demonstrated the irresponsibility of flying that close to people unless it had fully enclosed props, which is unlikely given the photo that appeared on their site.
Lastly, the final position places it pretty close to that last woman, and as my first point, the pages on her open book aren't being blown around and her hair isn't even fluttering.
Not a chance. That's why I'm thinking maybe the gimbal is detachable and maybe there's a battery pack/hand grip it clips onto for hand held shots. Maybe not, but I absolutely refuse to believe that was a flying shot.
I agree with everything you've said… except the conclusion drawn![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.