Hi Guys,
I am still on snail setting, me scared to do rabbit for now , the landing in Rabbit me scared.... LOL.
I notice when I tested RTL , Solo speed up 9.8 meters/sec compared to my full throttle SNAIL at 5.3 meters/sec or so.
The catch is, at 5.3 m/sec my Solo consume 250 watts and at 9.8 m/sec, it consume 275 watts or so.
Has anyone ever plotted speed vs watts in real flight ?
I know movie making is best to have Solo fly not too fast, but I am interested to learn if any of you has done this watts hours per KM or mile thingy.
On boats I logged all this to find the sweet crusing speed and it is usually at the engine highest torque output, or approx 4,500 RPM for an outboard with max rpm of 6,000. If diesel engine of 2,300RPM rating, usually 1,500-1,600 RPM when the turbo boost at its highest and hence torque too.
I never knew the difference was so great for efficiency between 5.3 m/sec vs 9.8 m/sec, until I seen the log.
I can't fly my Solo anytime soon, so me kinda itchy.... LOL.
Many thanks
I am still on snail setting, me scared to do rabbit for now , the landing in Rabbit me scared.... LOL.
I notice when I tested RTL , Solo speed up 9.8 meters/sec compared to my full throttle SNAIL at 5.3 meters/sec or so.
The catch is, at 5.3 m/sec my Solo consume 250 watts and at 9.8 m/sec, it consume 275 watts or so.
Has anyone ever plotted speed vs watts in real flight ?
I know movie making is best to have Solo fly not too fast, but I am interested to learn if any of you has done this watts hours per KM or mile thingy.
On boats I logged all this to find the sweet crusing speed and it is usually at the engine highest torque output, or approx 4,500 RPM for an outboard with max rpm of 6,000. If diesel engine of 2,300RPM rating, usually 1,500-1,600 RPM when the turbo boost at its highest and hence torque too.
I never knew the difference was so great for efficiency between 5.3 m/sec vs 9.8 m/sec, until I seen the log.
I can't fly my Solo anytime soon, so me kinda itchy.... LOL.
Many thanks