- Joined
- Nov 18, 2016
- Messages
- 892
- Reaction score
- 202
- Age
- 60
quadcopters are still rapidly advancing
Solo is old even in car years
the stock parts seem almost primitive to the latest DJI (1" sensor from the RX100V that does 4K60, sonar & IR sensors, roughly 2x the battery life and 9x the range)
and no I'm not talking about the upper end stuff...the Phantom 4 Pro with display is still cheaper than Solo package plus a Hero4 Black at launch.
Sorry to sound like a broken record but the Mavic is close to the perfect quad. It just needs sensors on the top and back and have Solo smart shots and I would probably never need to fly with anything else again. The handling and flight characteristics are so taut whereas the Solo feels like a boat now. I hope my fellow Solo owners will get to fly one before knocking on them.
you could continue to drop hundreds and thousands of dollar into Solo, but that's a different discussion. Stock for stock, launch for launch, a great deal has happened in the two years since Solo was announced.
PS I do love how easy it is to DIY the Solo...even if I'm not one who likes dropping more money on what was a $1900 package.
You said it better than I did. I used to work in retail and I understand sell price vs manufacturing costs. People have advanced the notion that the Solo is better because of its current cost. Someone suggested that it cost $750 to manufacture. In any case, just because it was originally $2000 to get into the whole package doesn't necessarily mean that it's better than the Autel, for example or the Typhoon H tha gives you everything for less. In fact, considering the original price tag you'd have to compare it with an DJI Inspire. Um seriously fellas? The Mavic is technically half the original cost of the Solo. The P4 is as well, in fact it's less than the Mavic. My guess was technical/qc problems coupled with the release of the P4 is what put the nail in the coffin for the Solo.