- Joined
- Mar 12, 2016
- Messages
- 3,920
- Reaction score
- 2,626
No. Download just saved it to your phone/tablet. To install it on the solo, you need to be connected to the solo, click the package, and select install.
I like the idea of doing a "Save As" operation, and I'll add that to my list of things to build. As for the other option, that's a bit more difficult. A Solex mission isn't actually a "mission" until you send it to the copter. There's a bunch of extra information in it (actions, etc) and it's laid out differently (ROIs don't appear inline with other items in Solex). So it would probably be possible to build something that shows the downloaded mission as a different set of markers on the map, for the purposes of validation. How does that sound? I like the idea, but would need to think about how to put it together so it didn't look terrible.![]()
In Tower after uploading a mission to the copter I would clear the mission from my tablet. Then I'd download the mission from copter to tablet. This procedure confirmed to me that the mission loaded correctly and what was in the copter was what I intended to fly. Nothing but another form of double checking prior to flying the mission.
I do this exact same thing in Tower prior to every mission. It is a great double check and it has caused me to catch an error more than once.
In fact if you combine this with the "Save As .." it will implement a request I penned to the Solex author a bit ago.
Just bought this app and tested out the optical follow. I haven't had much luck. I did the viewing angel multiple times...I walk out, I am in the box, I dropped a cone, went to the other box, repeated. Inputed the numbers and away we go. So, I have only been able to get it to successfully follow me once. So I know it can work. What am I doing wrong?
I am out on a sunny day on a soccer field, so really no shadows or change in background. I am on a nexus 7. Many times I would hit the smart shot, draw the rectangle, and the start wouldn't even be an option. So I would hit cancel and try again. Seems VERY buggy to me, but maybe it is just me. Any fixes? Anyone else experience this?
Ah, very nice! Looks good.hi there, just did my first panormana with Solex and it work great.
use a gopro 3+black with the stock lens and despite some "auto exposure" issues (out of our control) and some really minor parallax error (nothing serious and very easy to repair) the panorama looks very good overall...
click here to watch it Moravia
I have similar issues with my Nexus 7. After some experimenting, it appears that the problem is related to how the device functions when clamped in the Solo Controller's tablet/phone holder. If I remove the tablet, I can use an inexpensive stylus to tap-select with no problems. If I insert the tablet in the holder, I often must resort to using my fingers from different angles to the screen to select something. Not fun!
My latest thought is to make an extender plate from one or more layers of foamboard, then use dots of Velcro to attach/detach the tablet. In the field, insert the plate into the holder, then attach the tablet. Maybe someone will suggest a better approach.
People whom installed the Green Cube For Solo Will get these & other updates.Hi there
What are those upgrades for?
Any advices ?
Thanks
People whom installed the Green Cube For Solo Will get these & other updates.
Many new features via Solex...
Advice? plan to update to the Green Cube for Solo.
Search & read.
There are several threads & Videos to explain all benefits & "how to's"
I finally got some time to experiment with this using my Nexus 7. You are indeed correct, something about the way the touch detection works is different on the N7 than that of either the Shield or my iPad mini. The N7 needs a good path back to your body for the touch detection to work. Someone more knowledgeable than I about how these pickups work (and why the N7 is so different) can probably describe exactly what is going on.
Suffice it to say that I took a short, flexible wire and made a connection from tablet holder to a contact point on the controller. With that done the N7 now works like a champ, provided that my hand is on the controller. If I let go of the controller then the touch sensitivity drops again.
I made the connection in a hacky-but-sufficient-for-now manner. I cut a lead from a servo extension cable and stripped about a 1/2 to 3/4 inch off each end. I backed off the screws on the fixed (non-sliding) end of the tablet holder and put the bare end of the wires between the plastic and the metal brace then clamped it in by tightening up the screws. The other end I wrapped around one of the screws that holds the arm to the controller. There is probably a better ground point to the controller but this is working just fine for me.
Here is a photo of where the wire goes to the screw between the holder arm and the controller:
View attachment 6348
This shows where it goes to the fixed brace for the bottom of the tablet:
View attachment 6349
I'm not sure who told you it would be plug and play. It's never going to be that simple. We're trying to make it as simple as possible. But plug and play is not practical.Steve,
It has been mentioned that at some point "soon" the Green Cube update would be plug and play. Is there a time frame for the "soon" and what steps in the above referenced "how to's" will be eliminated?
Hi,I finally got some time to experiment with this using my Nexus 7. You are indeed correct, something about the way the touch detection works is different on the N7 than that of either the Shield or my iPad mini. The N7 needs a good path back to your body for the touch detection to work. Someone more knowledgeable than I about how these pickups work (and why the N7 is so different) can probably describe exactly what is going on.
Suffice it to say that I took a short, flexible wire and made a connection from tablet holder to a contact point on the controller. With that done the N7 now works like a champ, provided that my hand is on the controller. If I let go of the controller then the touch sensitivity drops again.
I made the connection in a hacky-but-sufficient-for-now manner. I cut a lead from a servo extension cable and stripped about a 1/2 to 3/4 inch off each end. I backed off the screws on the fixed (non-sliding) end of the tablet holder and put the bare end of the wires between the plastic and the metal brace then clamped it in by tightening up the screws. The other end I wrapped around one of the screws that holds the arm to the controller. There is probably a better ground point to the controller but this is working just fine for me.
Here is a photo of where the wire goes to the screw between the holder arm and the controller:
View attachment 6348
This shows where it goes to the fixed brace for the bottom of the tablet:
View attachment 6349
I'm not sure who told you it would be plug and play. It's never going to be that simple. We're trying to make it as simple as possible. But plug and play is not practical.
I think what Matt was referring to, is that the ArduPilot is consistently being updating by many coders & testers around the world "Thx God for Open Source" All this updating to "Bigger & Better" isn't for the newbie types, But for well seasoned enthusiast, cause errors do arise & reek havoc & no one to ask for warranty from. Only a promise that the next release will try to fix those errors / bugs.Here is the post I was referring to:
SteveReno
"do you have a list of pros and cons of the greencube ?
No Cons only Pro's
Solo as it is now, with out updating to the GC Doesn't have a future:
The "Green Cube" GC Has been specifically made for Solo to address a Hardware problem that exist on all Solo's presently.
1. No more 3DR to Update Solo
2. Electrical Hardware problem. 3DR fixed with a software fix limiter "Limiting for future improvements" The GC has Fixed this probelm permanently with hardware fix..
3. You have maybe 50+ people writing Code now to make Solo better
4. There is a Con, Not free, but since you most like got under $500 invested in your Solo, this is still a GREAT deal!
Many more New Features, but you need to research for your self.
I have joined the test group for the GC, but there are many, many others that have been busy at testing the GC to its' limits for months.
As soon as everything get tested & retested, then the GC Solo will be a plug & play type upgrade."
Thanks,
Greg
I think what Matt was referring to, is that the ArduPilot is consistently being updating by many coders & testers around the world "Thx God for Open Source" All this updating to "Bigger & Better" isn't for the newbie types, But for well seasoned enthusiast, cause errors do arise & reek havoc & no one to ask for warranty from. Only a promise that the next release will try to fix those errors / bugs.
When ArduPilot will have a Base release that is bug free & stable "Hoping Soon" then the Green Cube can be a plug n play update. Plug it in, update via Solex, then go fly........
My thinking is that Solo & it's owners are a New Breed of user a "Hybrid" type of user.
Basically this is what i did, but i know there was many, many hours of testing & much money spent to make it this as easy, as it was for me.
I make a bi-monthly Donation to:
Donating to ArduPilot project — Copter documentation
I'm also beta-tester for the the GCSolo.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.