I have over 100 flights with the APC 11x4.5 props on the stock motors and they stay cool.
Jubalr the 11" APC and MA are very similar on amperage draw but what about handling? I find the 11" props more stable and work better at high altitude. Have you formed any opinion on the flight chacteristics between these props?
Went out and tested 3 different props yesterday. Simple test of a 2 minute hover at 9' for each set back to back. Then came back and read the wattage required to hover. Why Wattage? Wattage is power in electric motors and with a larger # it is easier to see small variances. While these specific readings are with the 800kv T-motors, the actual #s will vary from stock motors, but the differences in the props will be the same.
First up, the props I use regularly. The 11x4.5 APC averaged 17a wattage; 254-264 watts.
![]()
Here are the results for the stock Solo props: 18a wattage; 265-280 watts
![]()
And finally, the winner in today's roundup the Master Airscrew 10x4.5 17a but just 242-258 watts..
![]()
Over the length of 1 battery, there would be small differences in flight time. But not sure it could really be measured with a stop watch given the variances of determining start/stop voltages. But this at least tells you where the 3 come in and you can take it from there..
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.