I think everyone on this forum recognizes there is a 80/20 thing going on with drone incidents like this one
Someone crashed a drone into Seattle's Great Wheel. A small number of drone flyers are making novice mistakes, feeding the fear mongering news cycle and adding fuel to the drive for more regulation. I am not sure if there are estimates on this topic, but I am certain that when you compare the number of accidents to safe drone flights this represents a small percentage.
I can't help but wondering if the Dji and 3DR's of the world got together on safety technology standards this situation could be improved. Perhaps created an industry safety technology standard (collision avoidance, parachutes,etc) for consumer level drones? We got shoulder belts, airbags and anti-lock brakes in every car via regulation but maybe a voluntary industry safety technology baseline might stem the current tide of bad news? In my experience it's always better to get ahead of regulation. Usually self regulation is less painful than government mandated.
The hackers will always be able to build what they like outside these standards. But for the 20 percent that are causing so much reputational damage, self-imposed mandatory safe guards might be better for the industry overall.
My 2cents
Someone crashed a drone into Seattle's Great Wheel. A small number of drone flyers are making novice mistakes, feeding the fear mongering news cycle and adding fuel to the drive for more regulation. I am not sure if there are estimates on this topic, but I am certain that when you compare the number of accidents to safe drone flights this represents a small percentage.
I can't help but wondering if the Dji and 3DR's of the world got together on safety technology standards this situation could be improved. Perhaps created an industry safety technology standard (collision avoidance, parachutes,etc) for consumer level drones? We got shoulder belts, airbags and anti-lock brakes in every car via regulation but maybe a voluntary industry safety technology baseline might stem the current tide of bad news? In my experience it's always better to get ahead of regulation. Usually self regulation is less painful than government mandated.
The hackers will always be able to build what they like outside these standards. But for the 20 percent that are causing so much reputational damage, self-imposed mandatory safe guards might be better for the industry overall.
My 2cents