Perhaps
3DR has a new official role...
Read:
3DR Named to DoT Task Force | 3DR | Drone & UAV Technology
3DR has a new official role...
Read:
3DR Named to DoT Task Force | 3DR | Drone & UAV Technology
I'm sure 3dr doesn't want people to register drones either, but if the DOT and FAA are set on this... 3DR might as well be in a position to provide input. Just ignoring it could result in even more unreasonable and restrictive rules.I'm disappointed they support registration, because it will do nothing to help.
I'm disappointed they support registration, because it will do nothing to help.
Another good point was that if it's gonna happen, they might as well say they're on-board.
How are you going to make current drone owners put their identification on their drone?I think its a good idea. I think it will help lessen the need for further restrictions. My take on the main point of registration is to make easer to find the people who are already flying illegally. The spokesperson said in the address, they are not having so much an issue with finding the drones that are causing problems but the owners. so if you crash your drone at the us open it will have your name on it. Might make some think about when and where to fly!
but I wonder how much it will cost..
I realize it's the FAA. Because it will be a federal offense, it could only be enforced by federal law enforcement- not local PD or sheriff which makes it even harder to enforce.Hey its the FAA, not me....So if registration is required, it could be based on serial number or could require a tail number or? They said fines for noncompliance, so park rangers, police & sheriff officers could issue tickets to those who don't. You would not even need to be flying it.
Not really. The rule could stipulate local peace officer and municipal officials can request license and registration, even if it is federally registered.I realize it's the FAA. Because it will be a federal offense, it could only be enforced by federal law enforcement- not local PD or sheriff which makes it even harder to enforce.
They could 'stipulate' all they want, but it can't be enforced locally. It would be up to each state/local government to pass legislation that would mirror the feds requirements. Which I'm sure some will do.Not really. The rule could stipulate local peace officer and municipal officials can request license and registration, even if it is federally registered.
They could 'stipulate' all they want, but it can't be enforced locally. It would be up to each state/local government to pass legislation that would mirror the feds requirements. Which I'm sure some will do.
Correct, and what I said. I can ask to 'see' it. But that's it. No enforcement, no charges for any FAA violations. All I could do is refer it to the FAA, Not that they are understaffed or anything and already busy with non drone related business.I'm curious how many currwent pilots
I disagree. Under current FAA regulation any LEO can ask for you pilot licences. What the difference of the registration- let's see how it is actually written. If you fail to comply they file a complaint to the FAA against you. Now you have a lot of fun at your hands.
14 CFR 61.3(l)(3)
Inspection of certificate. Each person who holds an airman certificate, medical certificate, authorization, or license required by this part must present it and their photo identification as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section for inspection upon a request from:
(1) The Administrator;
(2) An authorized representative of the National Transportation Safety Board; or
(3) Any Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer.
(4) An authorized representative of the Transportation Security Administration.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.