- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 8
- Age
- 48
I know this sounds like a post from 2015... But, since both of these models are still being used in 2020 and the landscape and offerings have changed since then, I thought I would look for some updated feedback.
I have an Autel Evo, a Solo (that has an mro gps and a Hero 4 Black with PeauPro 87 lens), and a Phantom 3 Pro. I also have a Typhoon G, which I need to sell, so if anyone wants a cheap but barely used backup to carry their gopro, pm me.
So most of my work is either real estate (houses and farmground sales) or miscellaneous commercial video production (commercials, some work for local news, promotional videos, etc.). I had made the Evo my primary drone for most stuff, largely for portability, but it also flies well and I've gotten good video and photos out of it, with the Solo as my backup and my primary drone for land sale video which I usually do autonomous flights through Solex. The Evo software for autonomous missions is way behind the competition.
As you may have seen in my other posts, the Solo had a bad cube and was down. On a recent project the Evo started having issues, so I bought a cheap used Phantom 3 Pro, and used Litchi to fly the parcels.
The Solo is fixed (thanks for the help) and the Evo is at Autel getting warranty repairs. The P3P worked great, and of course the range is awesome. But now moving forward I want to simplify and am wondering if I should sell the Solo or P3P, or if there is a compelling reason to keep both.
The way I see it, the P3P has better support from 3rd party software and hardware, and has far superior range, and a little better battery life. The Solo with OpenSolo 4 and the upgraded gps is more stable and probably a little better flying manually close to structures. While there is more software available to work with the P3P, the software available for Solo seems at least as good if not better. I probably feel a little more comfortable flying the Solo, but that's probably just because I havent flown the Phantom as much. I was very happy, however, with my fields that I flew with Litchi.
I also farm on the side, and I want to start doing NDVI scouting at least on my fields and maybe some spot checks for neighbors. So which is the better platform for me moving forward, in your opinion? Obviously neither is going to last forever and will have to be replaced, but as long as they're flying I don't need the latest greatest sensor for mapping and farmground sales. But if I were to say buy a Mapir camera for NDVI, should I get a Solo mount or a P3P mount? Anyone used both for mapping? If it helps, I'm thinking I will upload my mapping files to Maps Made Easy. I've tried playing around with Openmaps and the Evo, but my results have been sketchy. Thoughts?
I have an Autel Evo, a Solo (that has an mro gps and a Hero 4 Black with PeauPro 87 lens), and a Phantom 3 Pro. I also have a Typhoon G, which I need to sell, so if anyone wants a cheap but barely used backup to carry their gopro, pm me.
So most of my work is either real estate (houses and farmground sales) or miscellaneous commercial video production (commercials, some work for local news, promotional videos, etc.). I had made the Evo my primary drone for most stuff, largely for portability, but it also flies well and I've gotten good video and photos out of it, with the Solo as my backup and my primary drone for land sale video which I usually do autonomous flights through Solex. The Evo software for autonomous missions is way behind the competition.
As you may have seen in my other posts, the Solo had a bad cube and was down. On a recent project the Evo started having issues, so I bought a cheap used Phantom 3 Pro, and used Litchi to fly the parcels.
The Solo is fixed (thanks for the help) and the Evo is at Autel getting warranty repairs. The P3P worked great, and of course the range is awesome. But now moving forward I want to simplify and am wondering if I should sell the Solo or P3P, or if there is a compelling reason to keep both.
The way I see it, the P3P has better support from 3rd party software and hardware, and has far superior range, and a little better battery life. The Solo with OpenSolo 4 and the upgraded gps is more stable and probably a little better flying manually close to structures. While there is more software available to work with the P3P, the software available for Solo seems at least as good if not better. I probably feel a little more comfortable flying the Solo, but that's probably just because I havent flown the Phantom as much. I was very happy, however, with my fields that I flew with Litchi.
I also farm on the side, and I want to start doing NDVI scouting at least on my fields and maybe some spot checks for neighbors. So which is the better platform for me moving forward, in your opinion? Obviously neither is going to last forever and will have to be replaced, but as long as they're flying I don't need the latest greatest sensor for mapping and farmground sales. But if I were to say buy a Mapir camera for NDVI, should I get a Solo mount or a P3P mount? Anyone used both for mapping? If it helps, I'm thinking I will upload my mapping files to Maps Made Easy. I've tried playing around with Openmaps and the Evo, but my results have been sketchy. Thoughts?