I get most the bullet points but it's got 170,000 words?
Press Release – DOT and FAA Finalize Rules for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Press Release – DOT and FAA Finalize Rules for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
yea, everyone chimed in with'n a half hour...I bet your questions will be answered in one of the many threads about this today alone. And there is no such thing as a TSA certification.
^^ That blog doesn't seem correct. Lots of extra steps that don't see valid. See this website with information directly from the FAA.
Becoming a Pilot
In the blog (is it yours?), it says to go to the FSDO with a paper 8710 application and apply for a student pilot certificate. There is no mention of that anywhere from the FAA. You do not need to do any of that. It's Test and passing code, 8710-13, TSA check is automatic after that, and done.
Why would you want to add completely superfluous steps to the process that serve no functional purpose and, per their own advisory, will make it take longer? A student pilot certificate is not part of any process for Part 107. And the only form is 8710-13. You're suggesting people get certificates and fill out forms that have no bearing on the process at all. Why? Sure, if someone wants to do the 8710-13 by hand, go visit a FSDO, and do it the long way, they can. It's pointless, but you have that option. But student pilot certificates and an 8710 sans -13 is of not functional purpose.
If you have a good reason to suggest this undocumented method that isn't found in any FAA information, please do share. But just coming out and saying "this is what you need to do" is wrong.
I see. So it's basically a way to get the TSA background check out of the way prior to the August roll out of 107? Clever.
That said, I think you may want to adjust how you've worded your blog to be more specific about this. Especially since once 107 goes into effect in August, this paper 8710 and Student Pilot Certificate to shoehorn a TSA check is no longer a factor.
I may be alone on this; but my issue with the process is that there is no oral test for the pilot to demonstrate they even know the front from the rear. How can you tell someone they are cleared for commercial work without even knowing if they have the very basics of piloting down first? They study online for a test, go to the office where it is administered, pass and walk out certified. What does that demonstrate? That they know the basics of airspace restrictions? There should be at least a basic flying test required where you at least have to demonstrate that should your sacred GPS fail while nose-in, you have the basic ability to recover and land without running into someone/something. How about flying 600' out and experience GPS interference? Can you recognize and correct orientation? So, you can be certified before you even take it out of the box the first time? Apparently. Suppose we applied the same standards to truck & taxi drivers. Passing a written test is fine. It demonstrates you have the ability to read and study. Given the choice, I'd rather have a good safe pilot that couldn't read. But ideally they would demonstrate both.
For those that have been on this forum for a while, how many times have we seen users crash and try to blame the Solo, when we know it was usually loss of GPS while they were flying in the yard of their suburban home or they panicked while nose in and went the wrong direction. Both cases claiming that Solo 'failed to respond' to their input or went off on it's own and hit something? How many of you remember this 'use to be famous' video just after Solo started shipping last year. A woman flying a demonstration for a local dealer. We know now that while hovering nose in, she panicked and went the wrong way with the sticks. But she could have very easily been certified by today's standard.
Rant Over..
That's interesting. I hadn't thought of that, but certainly seems a good possibility,Your rant is warranted, and this was brought up last September in the meetings. No one seemed to care. There is an alleged "Phase 2" that will be proposed next spring. Truly, it's pandering to the administration's demand for "Do something, dammit!" However, a look back at Parachuting (part 105) and non-powered (part 103) demonstrates a similar cautious approach, after which AC's were issued, followed by amendments to the FARs. This may be the same time-honored approach.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.