In case you don't follow the FB Groups. My OP there apologized that this isn't specifically related to our Solos. That said, it presents a discussion that very well may impact where and how we can fly them in the future.
I copied the YouTube at the point that the sound finally kicked in (25:58 minutes).
Be sure to pay special attention to the statement made in here introductory comment by the FAA Rep that starts at 28:43 minutes.
Lots of discussion relating to "Remote ID".
Most of us are well aware that the 336 provision applies little or no actual rules for Hobby Opps. What they did do is to impost that flying under 336 be done by the "guidelines" (not enforceable as regulations are) set forth by a Community Based Organization. The AMA was not specifically called out but conventional wisdom offers that the AMA is the only "viable" UAS CBA. They were not invited to participate ii the hearing.
I copied the YouTube at the point that the sound finally kicked in (25:58 minutes).
Be sure to pay special attention to the statement made in here introductory comment by the FAA Rep that starts at 28:43 minutes.
Lots of discussion relating to "Remote ID".
Most of us are well aware that the 336 provision applies little or no actual rules for Hobby Opps. What they did do is to impost that flying under 336 be done by the "guidelines" (not enforceable as regulations are) set forth by a Community Based Organization. The AMA was not specifically called out but conventional wisdom offers that the AMA is the only "viable" UAS CBA. They were not invited to participate ii the hearing.