Hi solo mapping people,
Straight to the question: has anyone done mapping with both the 10mp 5.4mm lens and the 16mp 3.97mm lens? If so, is the focal length benefit of the 5.4 close to cancelled out by the lower sharpness compared to the 3.97?
I have a ragecams 5.4mm GPH4B and need a backup for redundancy on professional mapping jobs.
I have two stock GPH4B that i'm about to send to Peau Productions to have the lenses changed out. My original plan was to get a second 5.4mm for mapping and one 3.37mm for filming, but now i'm thinking I might just get two 3.97mm (or even two 3.37mm) and start mapping in those formats if I'm not really gaining a significant amount with the 5.4mm @ only 10 mp, because I can't use the 5.4mm lenses for 4K video due to the reduced sharpness and amplified vibrations.
Any suggestions on what to do from people with mapping experience would be greatly appreciated.
Damien
Straight to the question: has anyone done mapping with both the 10mp 5.4mm lens and the 16mp 3.97mm lens? If so, is the focal length benefit of the 5.4 close to cancelled out by the lower sharpness compared to the 3.97?
I have a ragecams 5.4mm GPH4B and need a backup for redundancy on professional mapping jobs.
I have two stock GPH4B that i'm about to send to Peau Productions to have the lenses changed out. My original plan was to get a second 5.4mm for mapping and one 3.37mm for filming, but now i'm thinking I might just get two 3.97mm (or even two 3.37mm) and start mapping in those formats if I'm not really gaining a significant amount with the 5.4mm @ only 10 mp, because I can't use the 5.4mm lenses for 4K video due to the reduced sharpness and amplified vibrations.
Any suggestions on what to do from people with mapping experience would be greatly appreciated.
Damien